“In
a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting
caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity.” -
Hunter S. Thompson,
Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas
It’s
that time again to talk more about “The Basic Laws of Human
Stupidity”. Having already discussed the ‘Intelligent’ and the ‘Stupid’
groups at length,
let’s dig down and discuss the ‘Bandit’ group and the people that fit
in that category.
In
the context of these Laws of Human Stupidity, the definition of a
Bandit is a person who makes a gain while causing a loss to another.
Though I prefer
the description found in Wikipedia, that Bandits are people who pursue
their own self-interest even when doing so poses a net detriment to
societal welfare. Yet
as I described in previous posts, there is variability
in this group and differences in the proportion of how much gain one
receives compared to the loss they incur on others. The ‘Intelligent’
Bandits tend to receive more of a gain than the losses they incur on
others, whereas the ‘Stupid’ Bandits tend to receive
a gain significantly less than the loss or damage they incur on
others.
Intelligent Bandits
Good
examples of an Intelligent Bandit would be the merchant or salesman who
overcharges his/her customers through various schemes (advertising a
product as
something better than it really is for example), or a toy manufacturer
who makes additional profit by quietly substituting various components
in their product with substandard parts. In both cases the consumer
incurs small, subtle losses while the Bandits
tend to receive more direct financial gains for themselves. Perhaps an
even better example of an Intelligent Bandit would be some of the more
shrewd politicians out there. The kind that talks big but tends to do
relatively little in office (thus causing
less damage), yet manages to enrich themselves through trading stocks
on insider knowledge, capitalizing on social and business connections
made in office, and influencing legislation in ways that turn a profit
for them. Their ‘cost’ to others is in the form
of salary and benefits and in some cases bits of legislation that
incurs a small net loss to the country or the people, but they manage to
leverage that into gains far more substantial than said salary,
benefits, or questionable minor legislation. Heck one
can argue (I certainly will) that many voters ‘vote’ like Intelligent Bandits, voting in
politicians promising to direct tax money to whatever government program
or industry that personally benefits them, even though it has a small
negative impact to the rest of the taxpayers and the country as a whole.
It’s important to note, however, that such voting behavior shifts definitively into
the Stupid Bandit column once the effects depart from the modest
siphoning of taxpayer money, and instead introduce or promote major
instability or fragility into the system.
Some of those who still buy in to the whole left vs. right, Democrat vs. Republican paradigm may heavily disagree, but I think one of the better, more recent examples of an Intelligent Bandit politician would be Sarah Palin. She didn't really have much impact as governor one way or the other and her bid as Vice President didn't come to fruition (hence her direct 'take' from the taxpayer and society was small), but she's managed to leverage a short political career into lucrative book deals (I saw her book on sale in a bookstore in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia of all places), commentator gigs on cable news, and speaking engagements. Say whatever you like about any more fundamentalist Christian beliefs she may have and/or panders to, but the way she's managed to enrich herself to a greater proportion than the amount she took as governor of Alaska and Mayor of Wasilla demonstrates an Intelligent Bandit leaning.
Stupid Bandits
A
Stupid Bandit might be typically described as the garden-variety thief,
such as the kind of person who smashes a $250 car window to snatch a
$150 car stereo
that he’ll sell for $35. Unfortunately it’s not the typical burglar or
thief that creates the most damage to society, even though they usually
get the most attention from police and the media. The truly dangerous
Stupid Bandits include such people as corrupt
bankers, companies, bureaucrats, and politicians. Think of the banks
who made billions facilitating unethical & risky real estate deals
and bundling them up into mortgage-backed securities to sell to
investors as AAA safe investments, eventually creating
a crisis that has cost into the TRILLIONS in damage to the economy and
direct costs to taxpayers for bailouts. Or the groups of corporations that
have essentially formed cartels (most often in
collusion with
the politicians to whom they give campaign donations) in critical
industries like health care, aerospace & defense, banking, and
energy sectors, enriching themselves at great expense to the consumer, the taxpayer, and the free market. Or the shills and stakeholders in the military-industrial complex working the political process to encourage unnecessary and
expensive military intervention around the world so billions of taxpayer
money will be directed towards military spending (and in the process also
throwing away the lives of thousands of Americans
and even greater numbers of foreign noncombatants). Or the politicians
on the more sociopathic end of the spectrum, who not only enrich
themselves through their office but also bankrupt the country and
destroy personal freedoms of ALL their constituents merely
to amass more power and wealth for themselves. And lastly, the people
who donate to and vote for the aforementioned sociopaths because of
campaign promises to keep the government money rolling in to benefit
themselves, whether they get it in the form of direct
government assistance, special tax breaks, or government favoritism to
certain companies or industries or unions. All of these people and
entities are akin to locusts…. devouring so much in their greed and unbalanced self-interest that
they destroy the very environment they depend on.
I'm hard-pressed to find the best recent example of a Stupid Bandit politician in the US, since there are so many to choose from. But given the events of the past few days, I'd say said example includes every douchebag who voted yes to approve the Cromnibus bill that will put the taxpayers potentially (though I'd say almost definitely) on the hook for over $300 TRILLION in derivatives bets held by the big financial institutions. I say to these people enjoy your 30 pieces of silver while you can, because whatever compensation you received will be absolutely dwarfed by the scale of damage done when the big financial institutions decide to take even more risks which will lead to this derivative bomb being even more destructive than if it should blow up now. It is stunts like this that lead to violent revolutions and civil unrest.
The Trend Towards Banditry
It
would be simple to think that a proportional increase of the Stupid
group would be contributing to America’s decline, but it’s my opinion
that the increase
in Bandit-like behaviors and the growing acceptance of these
behaviors is far more to blame (I also think Helpless behaviors are also
heavily contributing, but that’s a topic for a later post). And to be
honest, it’s not really a surprise to see the
Bandit group growing in number. After all, consider the examples from
big business and government that we are given:
- Unethical
corporate bankers make billions in crooked deals in the real estate
market last decade which led to an epic bust and economic crisis, yet
are fined
a small proportion of the profits they made on said dealing and NONE of
the big fish responsible went to jail (see Matt Taibi's piece in Rolling Stone for more).
- The
extremely politically well-connected former NJ Governor Jon Corzine led his company MF Global in an epic campaign of speculative trades and
misuse of segregated
customer funds, which led to the bankruptcy of the company and
customers losing millions of dollars (the last of whom finally got paid
back only this year). No jail time for him or anyone at the company,
and not even a bloody FINE for Corzine. Hopefully the civil lawsuits against him gain traction, but given how much responsibility he's been able to avoid thus far, I wouldn't bet money on the lawsuits winning.
- Certain
police & sheriff’s departments as well as the federal government
routinely engage in the form of legalized theft innocently referred to
as ‘civil forfeiture’,
where they can confiscate money and assets on the mere suspicion (no proof needed) that said money or assets are involved in a crime.
Said departments most often deliberately target people that don’t have
the resources, time, or ability to mount a legal
defense (immigrants, out-of-towners, people on the fringes of the economy, etc.). A percentage of
said confiscated funds go the police department in question, creating a perverse incentive to engage in the practice.
- Elected
officials in Congress until very recently were legally allowed to
indulge in insider trading, a practice which would land the rest of us
in jail, and
many were getting extremely wealthy from it. And while it’s
technically against the rules now, imagine the total lack of surprise
when Congress AND the ‘transparency president’ Obama quietly undid much of it, making the risks of elected officials getting
caught much lower.
- Huge
corporations give bribes… er, campaign money…. to politicians to influence the political process and regulatory agencies so they can
form de-facto
cartels, reduce competition, and cripple the free market to benefit
themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment